As a matter of fact, INC, while it had differences with the revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, they respected the high level of commitment and dedication of these young men. There are reports in the Tribune about Nehru visiting the jail to meet Bhagat Sing and his comrades, The reports in Tribune on August 9 and 10 of 1929, tell us about Nehru’s meeting the jailed revolutionaries, inquiring on them. Motilal Nehru had even formed a committee to demand the humane treatment for the revolutionaries on fast unto death. In his autobiography, ‘Towards Freedom’, Jawaharlal Nehru gives a very touching account of his meeting Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das and other young men, “I happened to be in Lahore when the hunger strike was already a month old. I was given permission to visit some of the prisoners in the prison, and I availed myself of this. I saw Bhagat Singh for the first time, and Jatindranath Das and a few others. They were all very weak and bedridden, and it was hardly possible to talk to them much. Bhagat Singh had an attractive, intellectual face, remarkably calm and peaceful. There seemed to be no anger in it. He looked and talked with great gentleness, but then I suppose that anyone who has been fasting for a month will look spiritual and gentle. Jatin Das looked milder still, soft and gentle like a young girl. He was in considerable pain when I saw him. He died later, as a result of fasting, on the sixty-first day of the hunger strike.”
The other aspect of the statement by Modi is to equate Savarkar with the dedicated young revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh. This seems to be a clever ploy to elevate Savarkar to the level to which he did not belong. While Bhagat was in jail, pending death penalty, he was requested by his family to seek clemency, which Bhagat refused. On the contrary he wrote to the British Government that since he and his comrades have been sentenced to death for waging war against the empire, he should be made to face the firing squad not just death by hanging. On the contrary Savarkar, after being sentenced for his role in the case of murder of a British officer; totally changed his stance in jail. From an anti British role he wrote series of apology letters, he surrendered to British and promised them to be of their help in future! He did remain loyal to British after his release from jail.
As a matter of fact Congress in recognition of Savarkar’s initial role was trying to put pressure on British Government for his release, but Savarkar was already writing petition after petition to British to release him. From 1920 INC was asking for his unconditional release, but due to reasons best known to him Savarkar preferred to give a written undertaking, which in a way was the total surrender. “I hereby acknowledge that I had a fair trial and just sentence. I heartily abhor methods of violence resorted to in days gone by and I feel myself duty bound to uphold law and constitution (British, added) to the best of my powers and am willing to make the ‘reform’ a success in so far as I may be allowed to do so in future” (from facsimile of Savarkar’s letter to British authorities). There are many such letters and British did grant him clemency.
This act of his seeking pardon from British was a betrayal of freedom movement; his followers present it as a tactical ploy to get released so that he can struggle against British rule. As matter of fact after his release Savarkar, floated the concept of Hindu nationalism, brought to fore the word Hindutva, (total Hinduness) and stated that there are two nations in the country, Hindu national and Muslim nation! This was precisely the equal and opposite of the politics of Muslim nationalism being brought up by Muslim league. This is what also contributed to partition tragedy.
So Mr. Modi on one hand speaks a lie about Congress leaders ignoring those struggling for freedom. On the other he puts Savarkar in the same category as Bhagat Singh. Congress was trying to get Savarkar released. Bhagat Singh remained firm on his ideology and path of resistance against British power. For his principles he undertook a hunger strike in jail. Savarkar on the other side buckled under the jail conditions and surrendered to the British. The methods like that of Goebbels methods being resorted by Modi need to be opposed.
- Arvind Kejriwal blames ‘outsiders’, ‘politics of hate’ for violence; visits riot-hit localities
- Will Amit Shah apologise for UP BJP MLA's remark on rape, asks Shiv Sena
- Despite the outrage, Unnao bats for rape-accused Kuldeep Singh Sengar
- ‘Yes on R,’ L.A.’s Super Tuesday Shot at Jail Reform
- Rahul Gandhi visits violence-hit areas in northeast Delhi
- Oppn to Strongly Raise Delhi Riots, Demand Shah's Resignation as Budget Session Restarts Today
- ‘Vida Americana’ Is the Most Relevant Show of the 21st Century
- Delhi Riots: Sonia Gandhi deputes five-member team to visit affected areas, asks it submit detailed report
- King of the Chavs - the neighbour from hell or a polite and popular charity worker?
- Why Bhim Army Chief Chandra Shekhar Aazad Has Decided to Be a Full-Time Politician
- News of the World phone hacking: CPS to undertake urgent review of evidence
- Bernie Sanders has praised aspects of leftist regimes for decades
- Former PM Theresa May warns emergency terror law will not stop attacks
- What the Hell Is Happening With Qatar?
- Democrats Use Migrants to Smuggle the Transgender Ideology into U.S. Law
- Newsletter: California, here they come. It’s time for Super Tuesday
- These Are the Dictators Donald Trump Loves
- He Held Her Down, Choked Her, And Masturbated Onto Her. The Law Said It Wasn’t Sexual Assault.
- 'I did
- Why India needs to scrap its sedition law
Is it politically relevant today to ask whether Nehru visited Bhagat Singh in Jail? have 970 words, post on www.milligazette.com at May 30, 2018. This is cached page on Asean News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.