Were Thailand a democracy, coups could not occur. There is far more to democracy than the right to vote. It’s about the rule of law.
Five years ago the country failed on both counts with a politically threatened judiciary and a partisan police force.
“Repression” prior to the coup was caused by people having the right to vote in a country that was not a democracy. The right to vote is a principle of democracy, it does not constitute democracy. The junta re-established some law and order. That’s not repression but essential to social stability.
The right to vote outside democracy is dangerous for the simple reason that, without democracy, there is no accountability.
Zimbabwe had the right to vote and produced Mugabe and national bankruptcy. Thailand had the right to vote and produced Yingluck Shinawatra defrauding farmers. Venezuela’s right to vote produced Maduro and poverty simply because there was no democratic system of government in place.
J C Wilcox
- Europe's Far Right Is Flourishing—Just Ask Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s Prime Minister
- Brexit whistleblower Shahmir Sanni calls for probe as lawyers claim Vote Leave broke election spending rules
- Africa: UK Urged to Push Commonwealth Leaders to Address LGBT Rights
- Massachusetts transgender ballot question puts bigotry and fear to a vote
- Federal judge finds Kris Kobach in contempt of court in voting rights case
- 14 Idaho candidates on Trump, how they voted & his job performance today
- Russian Twitter trolls meddled in the Brexit vote. Did they swing it?
- Syria strikes: Evidence and democracy are such nuisances when there are missiles to launch
- EU passes new rules to prevent far-right funding abuses
- [Investigation] EU passes new rules to prevent far-right funding abuses