The in-chamber review will begin at 1:40 p.m. by circulation of petitions. A total of 18 review petitions have been filed in the apex court in connection with its November 9 judgement — nine parties were part of the earlier litigation and the remaining have been filed by third parties. The bulk comprises review pleas from Muslim parties expressing discontent with the judgement. On Wednesday, the Nirmohi Akhara also filed a review seeking clarification on its role and extent of representation of Nirmohi Akhara in the trust directed to be created through the apex court judgement.
“It is submitted the role of Nirmohi Akhara has not been spelt out with specificity which is necessary to rule out ambiguity and future disputes,” said the Akhara in its review plea. The Akhara contends that the extent of its role is not spelt out in the direction and is instead left to the Central government. The Akhara also sought restoration of other temples outside the 2.77 acres disputed site.
The first review plea was filed on December 2 in the top court by Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, the Uttar Pradesh president of the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind and legal heir of original litigant M Siddiq. On December 6, five petitions, supported by All India Muslim Personal Law Board, were also filed. The Peace Party of India also filed a review on the same day taking the total to six petitions.
On December 9, a review was filed by the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha and the other filed by 40 persons, including academicians and activists who jointly petition the apex court seeking the review of its November 9 judgement. “The faith of one of the communities was consequently regarded higher than the other, thereby violating the secular principle embedded in the Constitution”, said the petitioners.
Rashidi sought review of the verdict on 14 counts. He said the verdict condoned the illegal acts and also sought an interim stay on the operation of it. The apex court had directed the Centre to form a trust within three months for construction of the temple at the site.
The Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha sought cancellation of the five-acre plot to Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque in Ayodhya.
- The Supreme Court reserves verdict on Maharashtra's plea in Koregaon-Bhima case
- Supreme Court decision on Ayodhya should be accepted: Muslim leaders
- Locomotives and the Supreme Court
- Supreme Court reserves order after 40-day marathon arguments
- Will not dilute provisions of SC/ST Act: Supreme Court
- Documents related to Rafale deal stolen from Defence Ministry: Government tells Supreme Court
- CT Supreme Court hears Cheshire killer Komisarjevsky’s argument for new trial
- Who voted to hear a charged abortion case during 2020 campaign? End Supreme Court secrecy.
- Expand the Supreme Court
- Supreme Court to Hear Whether ‘DC Sniper’ Lee Boyd Malvo Deserves New Sentencing