Singaporean activist Jolovan Wham chose to break the law, and Singapore had to enforce it, said Singapore’s ambassador to the United States, Ashok Kumar Mirpuri.
Mirpuri: Wham could have exercised his right to political expression in other ways
In a letter that was published by the New York Times (NYT) on Dec. 8, Mirpuri said instead of staging a protest in a prohibited area, and another without a permit , Wham “could have exercised his right to political expression at the Speakers’ Corner… or by publishing his views”.
He could have also applied for a permit, but he had not, Mirpuri said.
“If he chooses to break the law, then we must enforce the law,” he added.
The letter was written in response to a NYT article that reported on Wham’s one-man illegal protests and the subsequent charges he faced.
The headline read: “It was just him and his smiley face. He’s charged with illegal assembly.”
Consequences would have been different if it wasn’t just Wham protesting by himself
In his letter, Mirpuri further expanded on the measures the government has taken to manage protests in “densely populated Singapore”.
By allowing public protests to be held only at Speakers’ Corner or with a permit, authorities are able to assess the “public-order risks”, he said.
Singapore has the sovereign right to impose its own protest rules
Mirpuri also asserted Singapore’s sovereign rights to conduct its own domestic affairs:
“We balance the right to protest against the rights of others not to be inconvenienced by such protests.
And we make no apologies for holding to our own values.”
He ended his letter by saying Singapore does not try to impose its values on other countries, and so “others should likewise respect [its] sovereign right”.
“In any case, we do not think ‘free speech’ as it is now playing out in the United States commends itself to us,” he said.
Totally unrelated but follow and listen to our podcast here
Top image adapted via Tallberg Foundation/YouTube & Jolovan Wham/Twitter
- Does Lack of Enforcement Make Illegal Immigration Now Legal?
- Other Segments to Law Enforcement
- Competitors and Local Code Enforcement
- Five Reasons Why You Need Law Enforcement Training Online
- Recent Oklahoma Domestic Violence Case Breaks Stereotype
- Cambodian Law on Marriage and Family
- Vigilante Justice - When the Law Fails
- A Trap Set by Law - Beware not to Fall into it!
- You Can Fight The Law and Win - I Did!
- India Ambassador Praises House for Outsourcing U.S. College Jobs to Indians
- Payroll California - Unique Aspects of California Payroll Law and Practice
- Payroll Colorado - Unique Aspects of Colorado Payroll Law and Practice
- Payroll Delaware, Unique Aspects of Delaware Payroll Law and Practice
- New California Greenhouse Gas Law: How It Will Affect California Industry
- Payroll Pennsylvania, Unique Aspects of Pennsylvania Payroll Law and Practice
- Mexican Laws You Should Know About
- Payroll Alabama, Unique Aspects of Alabama Payroll Law and Practice
- Payroll Florida, Unique Aspects of Florida Payroll Law and Practice
- Payroll Hawaii, Unique Aspects of Hawaii Payroll Law and Practice
- Payroll Illinois, Unique Aspects of Illinois Payroll Law and Practice
Jolovan Wham chose to break the law, so S'pore must enforce the law: S'pore ambassador to US have 548 words, post on mothership.sg at December 10, 2020. This is cached page on Asean News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.